Abstract

Violence is a humanly unacceptable behavior, and countries and international organizations often fall into denunciation and condemnation, starting with the gradual initiation of punitive measures, politically and economically, to coercive (military) measures within the framework of international humanitarian intervention to protect the targeted parties from violence. However, the undesirable becomes desirable or ignored when it is a means of changing or stabilizing desirable geopolitical or demographic situations. This is evident in the overwhelming violence experienced against Rohingya Muslims. Silence or mere expressions of sorrow and anxiety were characteristics of international attitudes. But the escalation of violence has forced the international community to act, albeit at minimal levels. This paper seeks to clarify the reality of the state's attitudes, particularly the global and regional ones, towards this human tragedy, and to elucidate the reasons behind the weakness and shortcomings of most countries, especially the Arab and Islamic, in support of the brothers of religion and belief