Abstract

Responsibility is either moral or legal, and with regard to the first, it is achieved when a person violates a religious or moral duty, which is of course outside the scope of our research. As for the second, it is achieved when a person violates a legal duty, and it is embodied in three forms, they are either civil or criminal. or disciplinary, and these three forms may be subject to a person simultaneously or individually depending on his character or behavior, and the quality acquired by that behavior or behavior in terms of the availability of the pillars and elements of that responsibility. Or two or all of them at the same time.And since the judge is a public servant occupying a public position, any behavior that comes to him is not related to the public position and distances him from the requirements of the public interest and the prestige of the judiciary and the high status of it, or behaviors and behaviors even outside the job entrusted to him that affect his reputation undoubtedly falls under the penalty of disciplinary responsibility In addition to criminal and civil liability, if its elements are available.