Keywords : management


THE CARETAKER GOVERNMENT IN THE IRAQI CONSTITUTION

Essam Hatim Hussein Al-Sadi

Journal of college of Law for Legal and Political Sciences, 2021, Volume 10, Issue issue 39 part 2, Pages 585-619

This research deals with the meaning of the caretaker government in terms of its definition and characteristics, as well as the statement of its legal status, and this research sheds light on the subjectivity of this government, in terms of distinguishing it from others, as well as the statement of the basis of this government in the legal system, and this research also deals with the legal status of the government Conducting business by addressing the cases of the emergence of the caretaker government and the limits of its competencies, and that this government, despite being exceptional, is not immune from oversight, so this research dealt with parliamentary oversight and judicial oversight over the caretaker government, and this research sheds light on the meaning of this oversight and its means As well as its limits and effectiveness on the caretaker government in constitutional life.

THE LEGAL NATURE OF COMMON MONEY MANAGEMENT - DIVISION – DISPOSAL

Karzan Z. Salahuddin

Journal of college of Law for Legal and Political Sciences, 2020, Volume 9, Issue issue 34 part 2, Pages 259-284

The right of ownership is one of the most fundamental and most widespread rights in the original, since the king is focused on something specific and its owner can direct it directly and without mediation, which is independent of itself and does not follow another right, but other rights are derived from the right of easement and benefit, Rights are to be alone as they prove to a single person giving him absolute power over him in all legal acts . But the money may be owned by several people who share it simultaneously without having to specialize or have their share in it. The multiplicity of owners in the common property raises several problems with regard to each owner of the authority of use, exploitation and disposal, because the exercise of these authorities requires the consensus of the partners. Is always available, so the legislator intervenes to regulate common property so as not to disrupt the use of common money in case of disagreement and lack of unanimity.